Thursday , February 21 2019

Wall Street banks are still chasing a Chinese chimera

epa04026772 (FILE) A file photo dated 18 October 2013 showing a view of the Morgan Stanley offices in New York, New York, USA. Morgan Stanley on 17 January 2014 reported net revenues of $7.8 billion for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2013 compared with $7.0 billion a year ago. For the current quarter, income from continuing operations applicable to Morgan Stanley was $192 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, compared with income of $661 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, for the same period a year ago.  EPA/JUSTIN LANE


Wall Street is split on the value of having a Chinese joint venture.
Morgan Stanley and UBS Group AG are planning to raise their stakes in their securities operations in the country to the maximum 49 percent allowed, just weeks after JP Morgan Chase & Co. severed ties with its local partner amid frustration over a lack of control.
China increased the cap on foreign holdings from 33 percent in 2012, still below the coveted threshold of 50 percent above which majority control would be possible. Morgan Stanley, with 33.3 percent of its venture, and UBS, with 24.99 percent, clearly have decided the market potential merits the extra investment.
Whether that confidence is justified is an open question. The fact is that China just doesn’t make much money for foreign investment banks.
UBS topped foreign securities firms in the country with net income of 296 million yuan ($44 million) in 2015. That’s barely enough to pay JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon’s salary ($30.4 million). Morgan Stanley’s venture with Huaxin Securities made even less — 30 million yuan in 2015, though that represented a turnaround after years of losses.
Overseas banks remain minnows beside the dominant Chinese firms. UBS ranked 95th among brokerages in China in 2015, overshadowed by rivals such as Citic Securities Co. in stock trading and lenders like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. in onshore bond underwriting.
Debt sales are a lucrative business and remain a lock for Chinese banks: arranging yuan-denominated issues accounted for 75 percent of the Asia-Pacific’s total bond underwriting fees for most of last year, according to data from Freeman & Co.
For UBS at least, there’s an added draw in China: Unlike Morgan Stanley, the Swiss bank has management control over its venture (Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is another overseas firm with that privilege). UBS’s venture also has a license to trade domestic shares. Like Goldman, UBS has more than a decade of history with its venture, which has helped cover the costs of building out operations.
Morgan Stanley was the first overseas bank allowed to enter the market when it helped establish China International Capital Corp. in 1995. But the New York-based bank sold its stake — again after being stymied by a lack of control — and set up with Huaxin Securities in 2011.
More than two decades since that groundbreaking investment, US and European investment banks are still waiting for their big payday. If nothing else, they can’t be faulted for patience. UBS wants “to build a long-run, steady presence in China,” Chairman Axel Weber told Bloomberg Television from Shanghai on Monday.
China’s Ministry of Finance has said the 49 percent ownership limit will be raised gradually. No date has been given. HSBC Holdings Plc said in November 2015 it was seeking majority ownership for a securities venture in China. It’s still waiting. Meanwhile, local investment banks have grown ever stronger as the size of China’s financial markets has ballooned.
Without control, on paper or otherwise, a Chinese investment banking venture is just a placeholder for a promise that may never
— Bloomberg

Nisha Gopalan is a Bloomberg Gadfly columnist covering deals and banking. She previously worked for the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones as an editor and a reporter

About Admin

Check Also

Here comes DBS’s muddle-through year

Singapore’s largest bank had only the briefest of honeymoons with an improving global economy. Rising ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *