Monday , July 23 2018

UN passes N Korea sanctions sans oil embargo

epa06199200 South Korean veterans shout slogans and hold placards reading 'Instantly deploy the tactical nuclear weapon in South Korea' during a rally against North Korea's six nuclear test on downtown in Seoul, South Korea. 12 September 2017. On 03 September, North Korea carried out its sixth nuclear detonation, that it claimed was a successful test of a hydrogen bomb that can be put on an intercontinental ballistic missile.  EPA-EFE/JEON HEON-KYUN

Bloomberg ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

The United Nations Security Council approved new sanctions aimed at punishing North Korea for its latest missile and nuclear tests after the US dropped demands such as an oil embargo to win support from Russia and China.
The 15-member council passed the resolution unanimously following a week of talks that began when Kim Jong Un’s regime tested its most powerful nuclear bomb. The resolution seeks to cut imports of refined petroleum products to 2 million barrels a year, ban textile exports and strengthen inspections of ships that are believed to be carrying cargo in breach of sanctions.
“We are acting in response to a dangerous new development,” US envoy Nikki Haley told the Security Council after the vote. “These are the strongest measures ever imposed on North Korea,” she said, adding that the US remains willing to act alone to stop Kim’s nuclear program if necessary.
North Korea has yet to respond to the sanctions. South Korea said on Tuesday that the isolated state remained technically prepared to perform a nuclear test. Prime Minister Lee Nak-yon told parliament that while dialogue is ultimately the only solution, it’s not time to talk with North Korea.
While the US can claim a victory in persuading Russia and China — which hold veto power on the Security Council — to agree to the restrictions, the result is less than Haley had sought when she pushed for a ban on oil and a freeze on Kim’s assets abroad. And it’s unlikely to persuade Kim to halt his nuclear program and return to the negotiating table.
“Despite the tough talk, the US is willing to water down its demands to get support of Russia and China, and that is a calculation that we are more influential when there is Security Council unity,” said George Lopez, a professor of peace studies at the University of Notre Dame and a former UN expert on sanctions against North Korea.
Bill Richardson, a former US ambassador to the UN said the sanctions were “better than nothing, but not enough to really pressure North Korea,” adding that Pyongyang is likely to respond with a missile launch in the next few days. “It’s a partial victory,” Richardson said on Tuesday on Bloomberg TV. “China has decided to hurt North Korea, but not bring them down, not really weaken them.”

Representatives of China and Russia attempted to prod the US toward a diplomatic solution, emphasizing that the resolution calls for negotiations.
All parties should “remain cool-headed” in both rhetoric and action and “resume negotiations sooner rather than later,” China’s Ambassador Liu Jieyi told the security council. Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said a “political settlement” ultimately is needed and that ignoring the call for negotiations “means a direct violation of the consensus reached in the council.”
North Korea’s state media attacked both Haley and the resolution ahead of the vote, vowing the US would face “the greatest pain and suffering it had ever gone through in its entire history.” “The DPRK shall make absolutely sure that the US pays a due price,” the Korean Central News Agency said, citing a statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and using initials for North Korea’s formal name.
Despite the rhetoric, there were signs both sides are looking for a diplomatic solution. North Korean foreign ministry officials were said to be planning informal talks with former US officials in Switzerland, Japan’s Nippon Television reported, without saying where it got the information. Some Chinese banks have started banning new North Korean accounts or blocking new deposits to existing accounts, the Financial Times reported.
The sanctions will cut imports to North Korea of fuels such as gasoline and diesel by almost 56 percent while capping shipments of crude at current levels, according to the US. Anthony Ruggiero, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington, said it was better to fine Chinese banks doing business with North Korea than to try to cut off energy supplies. “The Chinese are not going to retaliate because they know these banks, firms, and individuals are doing the wrong thing,” Ruggiero, who spent 17 years in the US government as an expert in the use of targeted financial measures, told Bloomberg TV on Tuesday. “If you are in a C-level suite in a bank in China you should be thinking about what’s coming next.”

US officials said the new measures would cut North Korean exports by 90 percent, pinching the regime’s ability to get hard currency. The textile export ban alone would cost North Korea about $726 million a year, the US said.
Yet Kim has repeatedly shrugged off previous sanctions, staying focused on the goal of developing an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of delivering a nuclear warhead to the US mainland.
The Security Council has called for the resumption of six-party talks aimed at negotiating a complete denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. Those talks — which included North Korea, South Korea, China, Russia, Japan and the US — broke off in 2009.
As of last week, China and Russia were pushing back on efforts to increase sanctions, with Russian President Vladimir Putin questioning their usefulness. Both Russia and China have called for a freeze on North Korea’s nuclear and missile tests in exchange for a suspension of US-South Korea military drills. Haley has rejected that
proposal as “insulting.”

About Admin

Check Also

Trump’s two hours alone with Putin still rattling US

Bloomberg President Donald Trump’s one-on-one meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin continues to unsettle lawmakers ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *