Wednesday , September 20 2017

Samsung’s Lee summoned in S Korea bribery probe

FILE PHOTO: Jay Y. Lee attends a prize ceremony in Seoul, South Korea, June 1, 2015.  REUTERS/Cho Seong-joon/Pool/File photo

 

Bloomberg

Special prosecutors called Samsung Electronics Co. Vice Chairman Jay Y. Lee for questioning as a suspect in a bribery investigation, deepening an influence-peddling scandal that has already led to the impeachment of South Korea’s president. The de facto head of the Samsung Group was summoned to appear at 9:30 a.m. in Seoul on Thursday, special prosecution spokesman Lee Kyu-chul said in a briefing. While Lee, 48, was widely expected to be called in for questioning, the fact that he was identified as a suspect was a surprise.
South Korea has been in the grip of a presidential scandal for months, with millions taking to the streets to demand the ouster of President Park Geun-hye. Authorities are looking into whether Samsung and other chaebol business groups made payments to entities controlled by Choi Soon-sil, a Park confidant, in exchange for political favors. The intensifying focus on Lee may jeopardize his ability to succeed his father at the head of Samsung.
“Special prosecutors are mainly after President Park, but in this case, to charge Park with bribery, they have to prove her connection with Samsung,” said Chung Sun-sup, who runs corporate researcher Chaebul.com. “Prosecutors used to overlook the chaebols’ wrongdoings in the past, but this scandal is different because citizens can no longer tolerate the cozy relationship between politics and business.”
Prosecutors are investigating whether Samsung provided support to Choi in exchange for government help in Lee’s efforts to take control of the conglomerate. In particular, they want to know whether the president exerted pressure on Korea’s national pension service to support the controversial merger of two Samsung Group companies, Cheil Industries Inc. and Samsung C&T Corp. The deal, opposed by some investors, was approved in 2015 and makes it easier for Lee to gain influence over the sprawling conglomerate his grandfather founded.
If the heir apparent ends up being prosecuted in the investigation, it would disrupt years of planning for him to take over from his father. The younger Lee is the only son of Samsung Group Chairman Lee Kun-hee and has taken over some responsibilities since his father suffered a heart attack in 2014. “It would be nearly impossible to proceed with Samsung’s succession plan,” said Kim Sang-Jo, professor at Hansung University. “Every succession move will be pushed back for a considerable period of time.”
Samsung’s offices have been searched as part of the Park probe and Lee faced questions from parliament and prosecutors last year. Two other top Samsung executives were called in on Monday to answer questions about the company’s role. Today, investigators asked parliament to file a complaint against Lee for perjury during parliamentary testimony, without providing further details.
Prosecutors have recovered a tablet PC that they believe belongs to Choi and includes some of her e-mails. They presented the device to reporters at a briefing today and said one e-mail from it indicates Choi received funds from Samsung.
A representative for Samsung Electronics declined to comment. Shares in the Suwon, South Korea-based company rose to a new high on Wednesday, climbing 2.8 percent to 1,914,000 won at the close in Seoul, following an upbeat earnings announcement last week that highlighted the resilience of the company’s business.
When he testified in December, Lee said he never ordered donations to be made in return for preferential measures and rejected allegations he received wrongful government support to push through the merger. Still, Lee, who has been put under a travel ban, confirmed his private meetings with Park and that Samsung had provided a horse worth 1 billion won ($837,000) that was used for equestrian lessons by Choi’s daughter.
When the merger of Cheil and Samsung C&T was originally proposed, shareholders including activist Paul Elliott Singer fought against it, arguing the purchase price was too low and would cement the founding family’s control at the expense of minority shareholders. Samsung responded by saying it was trying to create long-term value for investors and the merger was necessary to sustain growth.

About Admin

Check Also

Lead pix copy

Sharjah FDI Forum 2017opens

Sharjah / WAM His Highness Dr Sheikh Sultan bin Mohammed Al Qasimi, Supreme Council Member ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *