Thursday , February 22 2018

Credit Agricole bucks trend as lender sees resilient trading

Bloomberg

Credit Agricole SA finished 2017 with an unexpected increase in trading revenue as demand for buying and selling fixed-income securities defied the weak trend seen at most of its rivals.
France’s second-largest bank posted a 1 percent revenue gain at its trading business in the fourth quarter, according to a statement on Wednesday. Three analysts surveyed by Bloomberg estimated declines between 4 percent and 20 percent. At the large-customers unit, which also includes corporate lending and securities services, revenue increased almost 5 percent from a year earlier.
The capital-markets business enjoyed a “good performance, in particular in credit and securitisation, despite low volatility” that hurt areas such as currency trading, the bank said in a presentation.
Still, tax cuts in France and the US weighed on Credit Agricole’s earnings as the Paris-based bank booked 384 million euros ($474 million) of one-time charges in the quarter tied to deferred tax assets. Global financial firms including Deutsche Bank AG and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. have booked billions of dollars in accounting charges after President Donald Trump signed legislation reducing the US corporate tax rate.
Credit Agricole gets most of its trading revenue from products tied to bonds, currencies and commodities. Among its competitors, BNP Paribas SA’s revenue from fixed-income trading fell 27 percent in the fourth quarter, while Societe Generale SA, the country’s third-largest bank, had a 6.5 percent drop.
On top of higher investment-banking revenue, expansion in managing money also fueled revenue growth. Amundi SA, the asset manager the bank controls, acquired Pioneer Investments in mid-2017. At the French retail unit, LCL, revenue fell about 4 percent, in line with estimates from Deutsche Bank research. Record low rates weighed on performances, though demand for loans picked up in France.
The bank plans to pay a dividend of 63 cents a share and said it opted to “neutralise” the effect of the tax surcharge by not reducing the payout accordingly.

About Admin

Check Also

How a $1.8 billion Indian bank fraud lasted seven years

Bloomberg The story of how India’s biggest bank fraud went undetected for seven years includes ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *